House OKs $895B Defense Bill, Pay Raise12/12 06:13

   The House on Wednesday passed a $895 billion measure that authorizes a 1% 
increase in defense spending this fiscal year and would give a double-digit pay 
raise to about half of the enlisted service members in the military.

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- The House on Wednesday passed a $895 billion measure that 
authorizes a 1% increase in defense spending this fiscal year and would give a 
double-digit pay raise to about half of the enlisted service members in the 
military.

   The bill is traditionally strongly bipartisan, but some Democratic lawmakers 
opposed the inclusion of a ban on transgender medical treatments for children 
of military members if such treatment could result in sterilization.

   The bill passed the House by a vote of 281-140 and will next move to the 
Senate, where lawmakers had sought a bigger boost in defense spending than the 
current measure allows.

   Lawmakers are touting the bill's 14.5% pay raise for junior enlisted service 
members and a 4.5% increase for others as key to improving the quality of life 
for those serving in the U.S. military. Those serving as junior enlisted 
personnel are in pay grades that generally track with their first enlistment 
term.

   Lawmakers said service member pay has failed to remain competitive with the 
private sector, forcing many military families to rely on food banks and 
government assistance programs to put food on the table. The bill also provides 
significant new resources for child care and housing.

   "No service member should have to live in squalid conditions and no military 
family should have to rely on food stamps to feed their children, but that's 
exactly what many of our service members are experiencing, especially the 
junior enlisted," said Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., chairman of the House Armed 
Services Committee. "This bill goes a long way to fixing that."

   The bill sets key Pentagon policy that lawmakers will attempt to fund 
through a follow-up appropriations bill. The overall spending tracks the 
numbers established in a 2023 agreement that then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy 
reached with President Joe Biden to increase the nation's borrowing authority 
and avoid a federal default in exchange for spending restraints. Many senators 
had wanted to increase defense spending some $25 billion above what was called 
for in that agreement, but those efforts failed.

   Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., who is expected to serve as the next chairman of 
the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the overall spending level was a 
"tremendous loss for our national defense," though he agreed with many 
provisions within the bill.

   "We need to make a generational investment to deter the Axis of Aggressors. 
I will not cease work with my congressional colleagues, the Trump 
administration, and others until we achieve it," Wicker said.

   House Republicans don't want to go above the McCarthy-Biden agreement for 
defense spending and are looking to go way below it for many non-defense 
programs.

   They are also focused on cultural issues. The bill prohibits funding for 
teaching critical race theory in the military and prohibits TRICARE health 
plans from covering gender dysphoria treatment for children under 18 if that 
treatment could result in sterilization.

   Rep. Adam Smith of Washington state, the ranking Democratic member of the 
House Armed Services Committee, said minors dealing with gender dysphoria is a 
"very real problem." He said the treatments available, including puberty 
blockers and hormone therapy, have proven effective at helping young people 
dealing with suicidal thoughts, anxiety and depression.

   "These treatments changed their lives and in many cases saved their lives," 
Smith said. "And in this bill, we decided we're going to bar servicemembers' 
children from having access to that."

   Smith said the number of minors in service member families receiving 
transgender medical care extends into the thousands. He could have supported a 
study asking medical experts to determine whether such treatments are too often 
used, but a ban on health insurance coverage went too far. He said Speaker Mike 
Johnson's office insisted upon the ban and said the provision "taints an 
otherwise excellent piece of legislation."

   Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, called the ban a step in the right direction, 
saying, "I think these questions need to be pulled out of the debate of 
defense, so we can get back to the business of defending the United States of 
America without having to deal with social engineering debates."

   Smith said he agrees with Roy that lawmakers should be focused on the 
military and not on cultural conflicts, "and yet, here it is in this bill."

   Branden Marty, a Navy veteran who served for 13 years, said the loss of 
health coverage for transgender medical treatments could prompt some with 
valuable experience to leave the military, affecting national security because 
"we already struggle from a recruiting and retention standpoint." He also said 
the bill could regularly force service members into difficult choices 
financially.

   "It will be tough for a lot of them because of out-of-pocket expenses, 
especially enlisted members who we know already struggle with food insecurity," 
said Marty, the father of a transgender teenager. "They don't get paid very 
much, so they're going to be making a lot of choices on a day-to-day, tactical 
level."

   Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the House Democratic leader, said his team was not 
telling Democrats how to vote on the bill.

   "There's a lot of positive things in the National Defense Authorization Act 
that were negotiated in a bipartisan way, and there are some troubling 
provisions in a few areas as well," Jeffries said.

   Overall, 81 Democrats ended up voting for the bill and 124 against it. On 
the Republican side, 200 voted for the bill and 16 against.

   "It's disappointing to see 124 of my Democrat colleagues vote against our 
brave men and women in uniform over policies that have nothing to do with their 
intended mission," Johnson said.

   The defense policy bill also looks to strengthen deterrence against China. 
It calls for investing $15.6 billion to build military capabilities in the 
Indo-Pacific region. The Biden administration had requested about $10 billion.

   On Israel, the bill, among other things, includes an expansion of U.S. joint 
military exercises with Israel and a prohibition on the Pentagon citing 
casualty data from Hamas.

   The defense policy bill is one of the final measures that lawmakers view as 
a must-pass before making way for a new Congress in January.